The other night I had a dream that was scary enough to wake me up. This hardly ever happens. Usually, my dreams are pleasant or exciting, and very occasionally disturbingly erotic.

I dreamed that I arrived at work one morning. No one was home, all the cars were gone, but the doors were wide open. A dead sheep with its throat slit was outside. I just KNEW there was a mountain lion inside. Of course, the prudent thing to do would be to go back out to my car and start the engine, but I was afraid someone might be inside trapped with the lion. I realized that I had no weapon whatsoever with which to face the lion.

That was when I woke up in a cold sweat, swearing to myself to buy a .45 the very next day and apply for a concealed weapon permit. I rolled over and went straight back to sleep with that settled.

In the light of day, it made more sense to get a .44. It has almost as much firepower as a .45, the most you can reasonably get out of something you can carry on your person, and which might be enough to stop a lion (though it would probably just tick off a grizzly), but might not break your wrist while firing it. Then I didn’t really think about it again. Still, I’m a little worried. I haven’t been concerned with humans; they’re stupid and are easily out-thought/run. Plus, both at work and at home, I have access to a variety of knives, which are just as effective in close quarters as a firearm. I generally carry one in my back pocket as well.

But a big cat worries me. They’re not likely to attack a human, and when they do, it’s out in the woods, on their home turf, and their victims generally aren’t paying attention.

So I’ve been thinking about getting a Taser. Would one stop a big cat? It would certainly help against a human, though if someone is on enough drugs it won’t do much.

Some say that dreams are the brain’s way of practicing for contingencies, and sometimes those contingencies are pretty far-fetched, like my recurring dream that I’m taking a final for a class I’ve never attended or am about to go on stage for a play I’ve never rehearsed. I’ve stopped being worried by these dreams and now just enjoy the flow. But now I’m dreaming about mountain lions. But you know what? Mountain lions don’t usually go into houses.

Still, I might feel better with a .44 strapped to my back.

13 responses to “Dreams”

  1. Nathan Avatar
    Nathan

    You are mistaken about the relative power of a “.44” vs. a “.45”.

    Max energy of a .45 on wikipedia: 518 ft·lbf
    Max energy of a .44 on wikipedia: 1,499 ft·lbf

    A .44 would most definitely stop a grizzly.
    A .45 would more than likely stop a lion. Plus they make really nice sized .45s for proper carrying.

  2. Nathan Avatar
    Nathan

    What’s your point? You said: “In the light of day, it made more sense to get a .44. It has almost as much firepower as a .45, the most you can reasonably get out of something you can carry on your person, and which might be enough to stop a lion (though it would probably just tick off a grizzly), but might not break your wrist while firing it.”

    I’m saying: .44s do not have “almost as much firepower as a .45.”

    .44s have more firepower than .45s. And, as you can see from that yahoo post, .45s aren’t recommended for bear.

  3. Jim Avatar
    Jim

    Although the total energy is important in the instant question the momentum is the primary consideration

  4. Kelsey Avatar
    Kelsey

    I’m pretty sure Dirty Harry had a .44…

  5. Berck Avatar
    Berck

    A fully loaded .45 will produce more power than a .44. No one generally loads .45 cartridges that way, and it’s not fair to compare a .44 magnum with a .45 ACP. And no, I know nothing about guns. A heavily loaded (“hunting round”) .45 is just fine for bear. In terms of readily available guns and cartridges, however, a .44 is much more powerful than a .45. This has little to do with the physics behind it, however, (which indicates the opposite) and everything to do with history and manufacturing. In conclusion, Nathan is of course right for all practical purposes.

  6. Berck Avatar
    Berck

    Also, if you want to quote Wikipedia numbers:

    1,923 ft·lbf (2,607 J) from a .454 Casull.
    1,923 > 1,499. Therefore a .45 CAN have more power than a .44, though it generally doesn’t.

  7. Nathan Avatar
    Nathan

    Listen up people. The name “.45” doesn’t simply refer to the bullet diameter. It specifies the entire package(cartridge), casing included. I’m not going to let you claim that a “.45” is the same as a “.454 Casull”. They’re not the same at all.

    So, when you refer to a “.45” you’re referring to, in general, a .45 ACP cartridge:
    Bullet diameter 0.451 in (11.5 mm)
    and
    Case length 0.898 in (22.8 mm)

    And when you refer to a “.44” you’re referring to, in general:
    Bullet diameter 0.429 in (10.9 mm)
    and
    Case length 1.285 in (32.6 mm)

    The .44 has more casing behind it so generally it will hold more powder. You could put only one grain of powder in a .44 cartridge. This would make it perform so poorly it might not make it out of the barrel. You’d then have a .44 with much less power than a .45. But really, that’s not normal.

    The comment that started this off was “…it made more sense to get a .44. It has almost as much firepower as a .45…”

    And that’s just silly.

  8. Jonah Avatar

    Still, a .44 is only good for up to brown bear (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.44#Suitable_game). Grizzlies are very difficult to stop, and you’re going to be pretty lucky if you’re able to take one down with a hand gun. Generally, the best bet seems to be a shotgun loaded with slugs.

  9. Berck Avatar
    Berck

    No. A .45 means a .45 caliber which refers to diameter *not* not to a specific cartridge. If what you mean is a .45 ACP or a .45 Colt, or a .44 Magnum, you should say so. A .45 could be a .45 Casull, or a .45 ACP, or any other .45 diameter cartridge. A .44 magnum is weird in that it’s 0.429, but it still includes the set of the all things with roughly a .44 diameter.

    But, yes, Jonah’s comment was silly.

  10. Nathan Avatar
    Nathan

    Berck, I’m sorry but that’s just not how it works.

    “.45” is common terminology for .45 ACP…

    If I were going to shoot a .454 Casull I would not say “I’m going to shoot my .45”.

  11. Berck Avatar
    Berck

    Sure, .45 is common terminology for .45 ACP. That doesn’t change the fact that the characters or phrase “.45” means a .45 caliber cartridge. Just because a term is often used to indicate something other than what it actually is, or a subset of what it actually is, doesn’t change that term’s actual denotation. The way around this is to use precise terminology whenever possible. Just because you fail to do that, I’m not going to be dissuaded from the use of a technical term because it has a certain lay connotation. In the case of Jonah’s hypothetical .45, it’s unlikely she was even aware of the distinction, so it’s hard to know what she meant.

    This sort of nonsense is pervasive, and the average linguistic descriptivist would argue that the word phrase simply has two meanings and we should learn to differentiate from context. The problem with this is twofold: 1) It can be difficult to judge from context which meaning was intended. 2) The word’s technical meaning eventually becomes lost and it becomes impossible to use the word in its original, specific, technical sense without some sort of qualifier. As a result, I make an effort whenever possible to say what I mean.

    There are endless examples, but the one that comes to mind immediately is the word “tarmac.” Wikipedia has a good article on the word. In short, tarmac technically means a tar macadam surface. This sort of surface hasn’t been popular for nearly 100 years, but many people commonly use the term to refer to any paved airport surface. According to Wikipedia, “This term seems to have been popularised when it became part of the news lexicon following live coverage of the Entebbe hijacking in 1976, where “Tarmac” was frequently used by the on-scene BBC reporter in describing the hijack scene.[2] The Wick Airport at Wick in Caithness, Scotland is one of the few airports that still has a real Tarmac runway.”

    Now suppose that I want to talk about an actual tarmac surface. Without being very specific, you might assume that I’m referring to airport pavement. While this loss of specific meaning is not as important for the word “tarmac” it is obviously more important when talking about things like a “.45”. The fact that gun nuts are not at all interested in specific terminology hardly surprises me.

  12. Nathan Avatar
    Nathan

    Berck,

    I like kittens. Sometimes kittens are useful for keeping mice out of garages.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.